That State of Mind TM
+ Life. Poker. It's a State of Mind.
AcesAce Online Poker

« Home | ACF 1K Weekly Tournament! » | Nice bluff... Watch your back! » | Deuces on the River! » | The Big Game, Getting Staked, and the Tagaytay Tou... » | I Have a Dream » | Brutal » | Ignorance is Bliss » | Make or Break » | Grassroots » | Poker Done Right » 

Sunday, May 14, 2006 

Rake... or Rape?

Imagine an opponent that never loses, wins a piece of every single contested pot, never gets tired, and doesnt stop playing until everyone else stands up. He always ends up a big winner, day in and day out. Would you like to play with someone like that?

The truth is, we all do. This guys' name is Mr. Rake.

I guess most players don't really think about it, since they have gotten used to playing raked games all over the metro. The question is, how much is too much? Are players getting their money's worth when they play a 20-40 NL, 10% rake game with a maximum of 300 for every pot? Is it even fair? The sad truth is, the rake in our current poker community is unbeatable, unless you play in the high stakes table.

Let's do some math.

Let's say there are 10 players at the table, and all buy-in for 2000 max at the 20-40 NL game. That's 20,000 in play. Now, at a conservative average of 100 rake per hand in a 300 max-rake game at about 20 hands per hour (dealers in the casino are slow) it adds up to about 2,000 rake per hour. (I've done the math, and that's roughly the figure you'll get if the max is 300, about 1500 if max is 200). That's 10% of the money in play going to the "invisible opponent". If everyone plays for about 5 hours WITHOUT rebuying, they will soon end up with about 50% of the money in play going to Mr. Rake. If we only have one winner, he would cash out 10,000 only. If we have 4 "winners", they would have a profit of only 500 for the night. Truth is, nobody really wins.

Now, that doesnt sound like "Rake" anymore. More like "Rape".

I realized this when i played a home game with my uncles, of course self-dealt, and no-rake. At 10-20, with max buy-in at 500, i won about 4,000. German Snake also won about 5,000 and the total buy-ins for that night was about 10,000. If there was rake in that game, which we played for about 5 hours, we would have only won about 2,000 each, since the rake would have been about 800-1000/hour.

Since we have, in the words of nickG, "only one hamburger stand in town", we really dont have much of a choice. I'm not saying it's bad or wrong to do that, but this will really hurt the poker communtiy in the long run. It is simply too much to rake that much in such a small game. Bigger games have no problem with the rake, because their pots are very big and taking 300 doesnt really matter, but that's only for a handful of privileged players.

In the $4000-$8000 Limit Holdem game at Table One in the Bellagio Poker Room, they have a table charge of about $20 per hour, per player. That's it. Youd be hard pressed to find a 10% raked game in the US, or in any other casino for that matter. The biggest rake you'll find in a US casino would probably be $4 per pot at most.

In fairness to players, and game organizers as well, i believe that the normal practice of raking 10% and having a high maximum should be, in time, slowly adjusted and reduced to make the game beatable and ultimately enjoyable to play. I'm talking about the ACF here, but it also applies to underground poker rooms. Make the max smaller, that's the first step. I personally believe in putting players first, and this is the best way of doing it. If people see that you are prioritizing players instead of profit, then more players will come to your games.

I know this is a somewhat controversial topic, but i have been thinking about this for quite some time now, and i just had to get it out of my system. This is just my honest opinion, and i believe it will be for the best of the poker community to be aware of this situation and demand for the most fair structures and conditions possible not just for their Poker tournaments, but also the ring games.

Peace!

20-40 NL, 10% rake game with a maximum of 300... ACF ba 300 ang max rake?

Yup... it's a 300 max rake at the ACF. Anyway, I'll take this chance to advertise my no-rake home game... When we have SNG tourneys, even someone without money can play (of course they don't win anything since they didn't put out), and for the rest that do, then it comes out to a last man standing with a saling pusa... Imagine, getting to sit at the felt to learn from a poker pro like me for free... Of course, di pwede iyan sa cash game... But, then the cash games we play are so democratic --- 10/20... 5/10.. even 2/4... The 5/10 with a 300 buy-in can cost some almost 2,000 while it can make the big winner 6,000 bigger.. The 2/4 has seen a winner at 4,000... It depends on the mood of the players, so I don't really like to impose having them put out money that they can't afford... You want to do 100 SNG, then go... Me, I just try to get some practice done with different players... And so far, the results have been good.

In other words... let me rape you at my table where there is no rake...

ummm... ok.

I agree with maverick...but who do we blame for the 10% base? heheheh...but maxraking at $6.00 (P300) is a tough one to fade at 20/40...very tough.

The key here though is that competition will ultimately drive rake down. It'll come soon. Pretentiousmike2's game is an example.

Maxraking $6.00 at a .40/.80 NL game, it's preposterous if you think about it. I bet they are raking max for almost EVERY pot, since the max buy-in is 10K and people will call a pre-flop raise of P500 with any Ace or pair! and that computes to about P6,000 and hour, at 20 deals/hr.!

I am starting to prefer home games too, just hire a dealer, buy food and drinks, and you got a mean party. It's still the same. just more fun. hehe.

I hope that the movers and shakers of our poker industry (whoever they are) will do the right thing when the time comes that they will be in charge of the future of Philippine Poker. If i could have a say about it, you can count on me to put the players first.

pretentious, shameless plug ha hehe.

testing comments page.

Post a Comment

Poker Sites

Play Online Poker!

Poker Resources

Quote of the Day

  • The best poker I've ever played has always entailed peace. A relaxed comfort. Eyes open, ears open, radar up. Absorbing my opponent's every message. Taking them as they come. Not mixing what those messages are with what I want them to be. It's like an aerial view. A view from above the myriad luck-dependent reactions of those many people who never gain such a peace. And when you gain that view, that peace - when you'd rather have the truth, no matter how disappointing, over a false hope, no matter how desirable - then you're a player. The hand you're on slips into a stream of thousands of other hands, no one of which, because of your lofty view, seems unduly important, no false fearful emotions rise within you. When you gain the peace of lofty perspective, you're a player, and when you're a player, you're free.- from "King of a Small World" by Rick Benett
About Maverick
Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates